Photo postcards are a great way to stay in touch with family and friends.įSC Real Wood Frame and Double Mounted with White Conservation Mountboard - Professionally Made and Ready to HangĪccessorise your space with decorative, soft cushions
The next best thing to owning the original artwork, with a soft textured natural surface, our fine art reproduction prints meet the standard of the most critical museum curators Photo prints supplied in custom cut card mount ready for framing Professionally Stretched Canvas over a hidden Wooden Box Frame and Ready to Hang Jigsaw Puzzles are an ideal gift for any occasionīevelled Wood Effect Framed and Mounted Prints - Professionally Made and Ready to HangĬanvas Prints add colour, depth and texture to any space. Greetings Cards suitable for Birthdays, Weddings, Anniversaries, Graduations, Thank You and much moreĬontemporary Framed and Mounted Prints - Professionally Made and Ready to Hang Poster prints are produced on Vibrant Poster Paper resulting in timeless and breath-taking posters which are also ideal for framing Photo prints are produced on Vibrant Archival Photo Paper resulting in timeless and breath-taking prints which are also ideal for framing
I personally like the altered image better for my own purposes, but I cannot help but wonder about the fate of the original painting.Our standard Photo Prints (ideal for framing) are sent same or next working day, with most other items shipped a few days later. There are a number of websites (mostly Russian) that attribute the altered version of this image to either Bryullov or Kramskoi. The two false attributions that are the most persistent are Karl Bryullov (1799-1852) and Ivan Kramskoi (1837-1887). Rembrandt and El Greco have been suggested, but these are easy to dismiss by looking more closely at the styles of those painters. It is the altered image, which has been modified to make it more suitable for devotional purposes, that has been misattributed to various painters. The unaltered image, if it is not cropped and still bears the signature, is difficult in good conscience to attribute to anybody but Cornicelius. If you put the two images side by side, you can see that they are ultimately from the same original. The painter’s signature has also been removed. At some point, another version of this image began circulating: the one without Satan in the background tempting Jesus with a crown and with a halo added to the image.
”…So far, the story of this painting is tragic but not uncommon here is where it gets a little weird. Also, when WWII ended, most of the surviving artwork was confiscated and went to different Allied countries while Berlin was being reconstructed…“ The Nationalgalerie was heavily damaged by bombing in WWII, and it is possible that the original painting was destroyed. So far, I do not know of any later mention than Bailey’s 1917 book. I think this corresponds to what is known as the Alte Nationalgalerie in Berlin today. “…From these sources we gather that the painting was done in 1888, that it was 18 x 31 inches, and that in the early 1900s, it was in the collections of the "Konigliche Nationalgalerie zu Berlin,” or Berlin National Gallery. The story about this painting is amazing:
0 kommentar(er)
